SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.76-1.1%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stribe30 who wrote (25803)1/18/2001 11:50:44 PM
From: jamok99Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
stribe,

I was in a similar position as I was running a TNT1 and a Voodoo 2 with a p2400, and upgraded to a GeForce MX 32 and was very pleasantly surprised by the framerate increase and better details. I then tried a GeForce GTS Pro with 64 MB DDR and didn't get much better results than with the GeForce MX - but some research and Tom's and Anandtech showed that with slower processors, you wouldn't see much difference at higher or lower resolutions on relatively low-end processors such as ours. But with faster processors, the GeForce 2 MX lack of memory bandwith becomes clearly a constraint above 1024x768 resolutions, and/or when going to 32 bit color depths. Still, the GeForce 2 mx seems to be a hell of a card for the money, and beats ATI's and 3dfx's (RIP) offerings to hell most of the time. I used to own some NVDA, and bought about 200 shares a couple of weeks ago when it was about 30. Wish I'd bought a boatload more at those prices. NVDA corp. is a class act - excellent execution and keeping the technology lead in a very competitive space with very short product cycles seem to be something they've really mastered - wish AMD would take a page from their book.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext