RE:Frankly, I doubt it. And I challenge you to get off your feathered ass and provide some before I put you on ignore.
Not at my fingertips, but I did see that in a documentary once on public television. I'll see what I can find.
RE: hang out here, asking simplistic questions, then calling those who respond to you names like "condescending".
Your portrayal of me as asking simplistic questions is somewhat condescending, don't you think? When someone asks if they need to put their answer in "baby talk" for me to understand, wouldn't you consider that condescending, too?
RE:I cannot figure out if you actually believe statements like the one you made here or are deliberately trying to provoke
This is the "no gloves" thread, isn't it, so if I am provoking here, what's wrong with that? I know you can't handle that kind of stuff on the LWP, but it's supposed to be different here. I would like to remind you that it was you who started the personal attacks on me after I asked a question about liberals in general and cited the Kennedys as an example. Your response was to tell me I was talking out of my rear end with no rational argument opposing my position, then you barred me from the thread. So, as far as I am concerned, you have no moral high ground to stand upon.
Have a nice inaugural day.
Clinton out, Bush in :-) |
