INTEL TRADER Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTEL TRADER

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Berney who wrote (8877)	1/21/2001 2:47:10 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Read Replies (2) of 11051

Hi Berney: It does not make much sense to quote absolute numbers. Much more important is either per capita or per GNP. Now I dont know - had no time to look for it, but thats beyond the point - how US GNP fared 69. At the yearly rate of growth of ~7.5% US would be taxed today to the same amount as in 69. Which (ie 7.5%) I doubt. So point 1 (concurring with you): you are taxed today more than in 69. >>thanks that all other costs we incur have not increased ... or we would be paying about $3 a gallon for gas<< Point 2: so that's the reason for the Desert storm &Co;\. BTW I am paying 3$ per gallon (still not expensive enough for a nonrenewable resource). US is in a very interesting spot right now: a) large foreign deficit (denominated in $) b) very much negative savings rate c) budget surplus My guess: your new big white chief has a nice fat tax break ready for you. Well, I hope you'll pay your health bills with it - dont take the check to the street pls. That's number #1 worldwide. #2 (Nihon Inc) Id rather not mention. dj

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next