SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.845+0.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: quartersawyer who wrote (8895)1/21/2001 1:52:30 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
chapq,

<< Perry LaForge ... I prefer his statement to Conway's >>

CDG was an early invitee to GRF. They dragged their heels.

CDG has never shared the global roaming vision of GSMA.

<< along with the MSM 5200 to be sampled later this year lead me to believe there will be full enough interoperability to allow global roaming among 2G and 3G GSM/CDMA systems >>

Nope.

It will apply to Japan where there are no 2G or 2.5G GSM networks and could apply to Korea, although Korea will be looking for a multi-mode chip to support cdma2000 as well as W-CDMA.

The MSM5200 Mobile Station Modem chipset and system software is designed to address the Frequency Division Duplex Direct Sequence Wideband CDMA (FDD DS-WCDMA) mode of the IMT-2000 standard ... supporting 384 kbps on both the uplink and the downlink. That's all she wrote, so far as I can tell.

<< There should have been no need for compatibility with a 2.5G GSM system immediately preceding the inevitable 3G CDMA system. >>

There absolutely has to be.

Look at how the majority of UMTS systems will be built out (by existing GSM carriers).

The GSM network will be GSM - GPRS - W-CDMA.

cdma2000 is nicely backward compatible with IS-95A and IS-95B.

UMTS has its own migration path for the majority of wireless operators in the world. that is the way the standard was developed in parallel with GSM Phase 2+ and GPRS.

<< The GPRS rollout is probably a hindrance to the goal of a global 3G system >>

From the viewpoint of a QUALCOMM shareholder (of which I be one) perhaps it is.

But, it is a practical, cost effective evolution, allowing network reuse.

To bad GPRS wasn't 1xRTT but ....

- Eric -
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext