SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (123069)1/22/2001 9:12:07 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
Nadine, at the time Mr. Gore first "suggested" a statewide recount, the Florida state law deadline for such had passed. There was no legal way that a statewide recount could have occurred. Mr. Gore knew this; that's why he "suggested" it. It was a simple PR move, and it worked on you. In fact, his "suggestion" for a state-wide recount was toned down the second time he suggested it publicly for that very reason.

If you want to argue, a better argument is that Mr. Gore won the popular vote nationwide. He lost the popular vote in Florida. That's the reason he challenged the entire election in the first place. He never wanted a full state recount in Florida, because he would have lost such a recount. He knew this; that's the reason he had his attorneys challenge the military write-in votes in Florida. Had he wanted a full state recount in Florida, he would have asked for one before the legal (state) deadline.

In spite of the best efforts of his buddies like Judge Lee and Suzanne Gunzberger to illegally throw the vote his way, and his attorneys illegally challenging the votes of Florida military personel overseas, he still lost the state.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext