SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 221.67+3.5%1:21 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: peter_luc who wrote (26019)1/22/2001 1:21:06 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
> If all that we have for the second half of 2001 is an 1.5 Palomino,
> will it be enough to fight an enhanced P4 with 2 GHz?

Firstly, I suspect that this will be a 1.53GHz Palomino, not just 1.50GHz.
Secondly, what do you mean by an "enhanced" P4? AFAIK, P4 at 2.00GHz will be the same as it is now, just running at a higher frequency (and optionally running on a much slower PC133 platform).
Thirdly, 1.20GHz Thunderbird is competitive, and many say faster than, 1.50GHz P4. The equivalent Thunderbird to 2.00GHz, assuming equivalent scaling, would be a 1.60GHz Thunderbird.
Fourthly, the Palomino will offer per-clock performance improvements over the Thunderbird.

Imho, it looks pretty close in the performance comparison. Marketing is a totally different issue, but so far AMD is in a "competitive performance at 80% frequency" scenario and it's working out. So far.

    -JC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext