[I] read the mdd thread among a few others on si and was interested in this lps5 character who attacked you...
Curious also that you’d use the word “attack” in light of these choice excerpts from recent posts you've made to people on SI:
“you are such a blow hard.”
“...maybe they should have kicked your ass.”
“i guess you can include yourself in the group of bums.”
“i fully understand good analysis and i have seen several on si that deliver on a regular basis. you never have and never will in any format.”
“what is it with these jerks...”
And what, in any of these messages qualifies as an “attack”?
Message 15216101
“But you seem to suggest - and correct me if I read your message wrong - that there is something insidious afoot. How do equity, fixed income, or options markets (whether or not they are exchanges, and however they operate) "manipulate" sentiment? Are you suggesting that there is a conspiracy at work?
That above and beyond the market participants (putting aside the popularly ludicrous proposal that they are all "corrupt enterprises" in every aspect of their businesses), the exchanges and market centers are corrupt and have malevolent, ulterior motives as well?
Or that the alternative to a market - which would seem to be an "infinitely" fragmented, often price discontinuous, inarguably information-bereft environment of dissociated buying and selling - would be an improvement?”
Message 15216454
“I still - respectfully, as you have been respectful to me - completely dismiss the notion that manipulation is the "primary" pricing mechanism of equities across the spectrum of listed and NASDAQ issues.”
And, in the same message:
“Regards, hope to speak with you again sometime.”
Message 15216689
There are, as I said, too many things going on to make more than an assumption, whether based upon past experience or - as it seems to be in your case - the unwillingness to consider that you might not be omniscient.
If you don't like what I say, ban me. I will not accept, and will address, statements representing certitude (perhaps misrepresenting is a better term) on issues that are - beyond wanton speculation (or parroting, both popular in the message board culture) - simply not certifiable.”
"...attacked..."
Hypersensitivity or hypocrisy? |
