SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (130623)1/23/2001 6:44:29 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1577900
 
Let's talk again in three years when the deficit is back up to $300 billion. Bush's tax cut while require tax base growth upwards of 10% per year combined with stable interest rates, just to stay above water.

Ok we can talk again in three years but I doubt the deficit will be up to $300bil or even close. Bush's tax cut would not require tax base growth beyond 10% a year because it does not cut taxes 10% a year or even close to that much. The biggest % cut in the tax rate is for those in the lowest bracket, they get there tax rate reduced 33% from 15% to 10%. Over 10 years that an average of 3 1/3% per year not 10%. All other tax brackets get a lower percentage reduction in their tax rates. (for example my rate will go down by about 10% total not per year every year). True the rate cuts are not the entire tax cut, but the rest still does not add enough to require 10% a year increase in the tax base or to result in a $300bil deficit without a reduction in the tax base.

To look at it another way, the tax cut is usually called a $1.6bil tax cut. $1.6bil over 10 years amounts to a reduction of less then .1% of total federal revenue over the next 10 years. Hardly enough to require a 10% increase in the tax base per year (more like a .01% increase in the tax base per year). It amounts to a tiny tax cut.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext