Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AltLar who wrote (85191)	1/24/2001 12:51:13 AM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (1) of 95453

Though I think the Fed's mandating that the out-of-state suppliers have to keep supplying CA with Nat Gas and electricity is setting the stage for continued Ferderal intervention. Their involvement makes them a culpable party IMO. Bush (previously Clinton) say its California's problem and they have to handle it on their own..states rights? The energy secretary says all right we will help a little by mandating sales to California but just for a little while. Big deal..what do they have to lose? That doesn't cost them a dime. California will pay its bill if kept viable. If California doesn't get the juice it will collapse and then it won't pay its bill and a bunch of money won't go to the federal taxman. The FERC says we told you what to do now DO IT. They left off the or else. Maybe the or else is they will help if California complies with its dictates and if they don't comply they will be sent down the tubes. I don't disagree with the FERC demands...but it certainly looks like federal intervention to me. Zeuspaul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next