Francisco Gold - FGX.V Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Francisco Gold - FGX.V

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1204)	1/26/2001 8:32:26 AM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (3) of 1907

If they can keep up this pace, it could be $30-50 cost, and we would get more than $60-70/oz. My guess is we eventually see a couple more zones, and cash costs come up some. But, doesn't it look like they already have an incredible starter pit with $30 cost, and a fairly low capex rate? How has Guatemala been missed all these years, especially with so much on the surface? This is going to end up like the California Gold rush: "Ma, we're goin' to Guatamaly". Radius to the east looks to have an excellent prospect too. Actually if we check the maps, FGX has tied up huge concessions. See page 7: sedar.com Lest we forget, they have La Cienga which has a 1.4km X 150m area with chips samples averaging 3.5g AU, 15g Ag silver. A third low cost deposit? I hope our participants here are not too quick or cute about trading a rally. This one is a keeper. Why screw around? What we really need about now is a deal (maybe more so than $300 POG)somewhere for a five bagger or more to illustrate how cheap alot of these better quality explorers are and show the considerable rewards locked into these ridiculous prices.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next