Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 173.20

-3.3%

Nov 6 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (6589)	1/26/2001 4:33:24 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) of 196540

Eric L: Informative as always. A question re: "Customers won't be flocking in to buy 1xRTT handsets. This is not Asia. I'll be in a short line, and with the exception of you, me, and our threadmates, nobody will be specifying "QUALCOMM Inside" (which is really too bad)." Why? Or to put it a little more clearly, since the doubling of voice capacity (roughly) depends on both having the proper infrastructure for 1x in place by Verizon and having handsets which use 1x, won't Verizon wish to get that extra capacity in place and functioning asap? More to the point, since it appears that 1x phones will not be all that more expensive than CDMA One phones, why would Verizon not seed their customers with 1x capable phones which are backward compatible? Look forward to your view. Best as always. Chaz PS I for one will switch to a 1x phone as soon as it is made available from Verizon whether or not it can be used for 1x immediately in my geographical area.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next