rich4eagle, I usually do say "many" democrats. I apologize for implying all democrats. I didn't mean it, and also did not mean to offend you. Nadine mentioned that only 19% of dems (at one point) think GWB won a legitimate election, so a lot of them do not agree with me on that issue. That issue does have something (not everything) to do with integrity in my opinion.
Also, the reason I like to debate this issue is to help me understand how people feel the way they do. I want to open my mind further, and once in a while open someone else's mind.
That said, a good debate would be about the two parties integrity level, and I will debate that to me at least it appears that the democratic party is short on integrity. I think I can make a pretty good case without showing too much "ignorance". And I do not think that no dems have integrity or that all repubs do btw.
Is your position that the parties are exactly the same, the dems have more integrity, or the repubs have more integrity?
Last but not least, your sarcastic barb about me being "correct as usual" is a little out of line. I never put out a point that I do not feel is correct, otherwise I would be lying. I put them out for all to see so they can be challenged, and will revise my opinion if I am shown to be wrong. The problem is that most (not all) reply with personal attacks and assumptions about my personality (as you did) instead of challenging the issues I bring up. If I say I believe such and such, and you say "you are an idiot", it does not change my opinion. It reflects back towards the person who did not have the courtesy or intelligence to challenge the point. I think it is kind of funny actually.
Scott |
