SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: timers who wrote (62607)1/29/2001 12:43:02 PM
From: Archie Meeties  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Mining stocks do best (as in reach higher valuations) when the pm rise steadily and slowly. In swift, severe rises, like sept. 99, metal stocks struggle to keep up with the actual physical metal. Given the short position in Ag/Au t we're going to get more of the latter, and you'll do well with the physical. The other point is that you hold physical gold because of a threat of an extreme crisis - think bank closings, market closings, brokers going busto, etc... It's the little bit of insurance that nobody has an obligation on.

There's always the unforeseen with a mining stock. For example, this Cali thing could really raise the cost of mining in West - you already see that PD will probably close down some copper mines and one of Homies Cali's mines is seeing their costs rise $10/oz. What if you held a mining stock with great leverage to higher silver, only to see the cost of mining outpace the rise in silver?

One last thing. If everybody said to themselves "I'll buy my gold insurance in the form of paper gold" then gold would never rise, and miners would eventually be dumped as the pog fell. Fortunately, those that buy gold haven't fallen into this trap.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext