SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 98.59-2.8%Nov 13 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (63103)1/30/2001 9:13:17 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) of 116762
 
... [then] pundits [will] tell us gold [is] valuable to own. Richard Mazzarella

... still consider gold to be nothing more than tulips. Richard Mazzarella

Perception is everything with tulips. <VBG> Richard Mazzarella

... People have to get off the theory that gold is money
before anything serious will happen in application research.
I sense that change coming. [From: ???]

I agree, why would anyone spend the time and money
to develope a use for physical gold that can only become
a business success if gold's price remains at current level
of under $290.

With the possibility that like those tulips, the price of gold
can increase without warning based on fear or greed
or non economic supply & demand considerations,
to a price like $3,000 and crush any commercial applications.

Suggestion: Lets go back on the Gold Standard, and to prevent
this store of value from being corrupted we will have to create laws
to prevent gold's use in anything except jewery and national defense
and with very tight controls like those on dangeous or harmful things
one will need special permission for its use as in critical medical usage.

All persons, at their expense, will be required to have removed
and melted into coins those gold teeth they aquired before this
ban on that usage was in place. No Grand Father Clause will be
written into these laws. The only exception i can see here is when
someone has a front gold tooth, then that person must have inserted
into the face of the gold tooth tiny diamonds so that this gold will
qualify as jewerly. But only if this person agrees to smile each
and every time he or she mets another person. At random times
and places an undercover FBI eXtra special agent will approach
this person to check for a smile, and no second chances given,
as in no smile then out comes the gold tooth on-the-stop.

d:o)ug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News