PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (124816)	1/31/2001 9:51:32 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 769670

But the law should certainly train its attention to all accomplices in the murder, and that includes the aborting mother. I consider that I've accomplished something in getting you to finally admit this. But as I have argued here several times, there is no logic whatever forcing the law to send all aborting mothers to prison or to their deaths. The law can take into account circumstances of duress as it does currently. Duress? When I listen to prolifers on a local Christian station, they say women who have abortions do so for convenience. When these sundry means (birth control pills, IUD's, morning after pill) result in the murder of an innocent child, the “doctors” become murderers. Nevertheless, as it does currently, the law can and should take into account the extenuating circumstances surrounding a crime. Such circumstances would most typically exist in cases where an abortion is linked to rape. So does this mean the morning after pill will or will not be given to rape victims if prolife laws are enacted into law? Use of "extenuating circumstances" implies the morning after pill will be given to rape victims. Yet if prolife policies are adopted, the morning after pill will be outlawed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next