SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (124819)1/31/2001 10:06:34 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
It will take no great perceptiveness to understand why a mother’s role in the murder of her unborn child is not as severe (though it is quite severe) as either the role of the abortionist who murders children for profit, or that of a murderer who murders simply for sadistic thrill. Every reasonable person will understand the difference, and the rest will be by definition, “choicers.”

Are you kidding? The murder of anyone by a member of their own family (especially the murder of a child by a mother) is usually considered more heinous and horrific than a murder by a stranger for money. Ask anyone.

Consider, for example, the case of the lady who drowned her two young boys by driving the car into a lake some years back. (I think this happened in SC or GA - somewhere in the south. The mother claimed the car was stolen with the boys inside at first.) Compare that case to the murder of a Mafia informer by a paid hitman. Which is the more heinous murder? Most people would say the murder of the young boys by their mother. Would you disagree?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext