Andy,
There are many words that have been adopted by liberals that either, are intended to confuse the listener, or are a blatant attempt to alter the meaning of the word. My stance against the perverted actions by homosexuals is clearly known around these threads, so I won't go into to too much detail. I have seen homos feign a certain gay attitude in public, but have also seen the results of their true feelings in county, AKA general, hospitals where they have turned to alcohol, drugs, or attempted suicide to escape from what they have become.
Supposedly, it is true that every person has some of both sexes in them, but the simple fact is that the human body was not designed for homosexuality. The plumbing is all wrong. The anus is intended to serve the function of solid waste disposal, and nothing else. I don't know why anyone would use ancient Greece as an example for sexual preferences. Why not pick ancient Rome?? Both of them became extremely decadent societies and, not so oddly, both collapsed into virtual non-existence.
They say that heterosexuals would have less stress, and probably live longer, if they did not have active sexual urges, but get real. Where would we be without it?? I figure that men and women are designed like plugs, and sockets, so let the light shine!!
Today, "liberal" is, what appears to be, a harmless word but is merely a disguise for socialism. Their concept is that all of the product of a nation should go to the central government to be doled out as some sort of, elitist, group deems appropriate. Individual effort means nothing. A strong work ethic means nothing. In past history, nations that have been, or still are, communist, began by espousing socialistic doctrine, and once they won their revolutions, what did they get? Russia got Lenin, and Stalin. China got Mao Tse Tung. Cuba got Castro. I could name more, and have to look up others, but you get my drift. Dictators all!!! The United States was headed in that same direction, until now!!
~;=;o --haqi |
