Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (4373)	2/2/2001 12:33:18 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) of 82486

As for the safety of RU486, it is much safer than pregnancy and child birth. (Bland's solicitousness in regard to the wellbeing of pregnant women is commendable, though.) The Population Council and the FDA have determined the drug to be highly safe and effective (NEJM 1998). FDA approved for "safe and effective" in 1996. I'm sure bland knows that not only childbirth, but even celibacy, has a health risk -- women who do not nurse babies have an increased risk of breast cancer. <<<Bland does believe a fertilized egg is essentially a child. As long as it retains the potential to become a human being, yes.>>> "Essentially" is the trick. Your definition of "essentially" is that a blueprint is "essentially" a house, a loom and a cotton boll are "essentially" a bolt of cloth, a sunnyside up egg is "essentially" a chicken dinner. Bland, a significant percentage of fertilized ova abort spontaneously. [Does someone have that stat?] Is each of these entirely natural occurrences God killing a little baby? Okay, leave God out. Has each of these billions of natural biological occurrences been the death of a "child"?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next