SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTEL TRADER
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MonsieurGonzo who wrote (8905)2/3/2001 4:58:27 PM
From: Gersh Avery  Read Replies (2) of 11051
 
Years ago I saw a short blurb on the TV about a permanent magnet generator.

US patent office was refusing to allow this fellow a patent because of the perpetual motion rule. In other words more energy out than in.

I thought about it for a long time.

In a typical generator, the magnets show no sign of degradation over time. If what is taking place with these is a degradation of the net amount of magnetism in the material, then what you would have would be something like cold fusion.

Possible? Maybe .. But I thought that the device should receive a much closer look ..

If the device does indeed produce energy then the degradation of the material would be the only answer.

The folks that I linked to seem to be ready to set up small units all over the country.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News