SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (4449)2/3/2001 6:22:02 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
OK. That was expected. I'm cool with it. Let me ask you this--are you even a little bit uncomfortable asserting that your truth trumps my truth just because it's yours?

If I am to make any decisions I have to base them on what I see as truth. I try to make sure that I will listen to people who have different opinions but in the end my opinions and decisions have to be based on what I see as truth. What if a rapist used as a defence that he believes that he has a right to have sex with any woman that he wants, I would submit that it would be fine to impose mine (and presumably your) version of truth on him, that rape is wrong and should be outlawed. The difference with this and the abortion issue is that the contention that rape is wrong and should be illegal is not controversial. There is consensus on this issue. However it is still imposeing a version of truth on someone when you send him to prison for rape. If you think it is wrong to ever impose your version of truth on someone else then its hard to have any opinion that anything should be illegal. If you think it is ok to impose such a vision of truth if their is a strong consensus of opinion behind it then your position is more consistant.

let's say that a series of studies pretty conclusively demonstrates that human population growth will destroy our world within 20 years. That's "massive justification," isn't it? I know it's far fetched, but I'm trying to figure out if there's anything that trumps the protection of fetuses. Would that change your view of abortion?

I'll assume as part of arguement that population growth will destroy the world only in 20 years only if a plan to control who gets to reproduce is not implemented and that if it is everything will be just fine. This combination of circumstances is just about imposible but as you said we are only assumeing it for the sake of argument, not asserting that it is actually true. In that case the forced bith control plan might be considered a necessary evil. It would still be evil but I could not oppose its implementation unless I can come up with an alternate solution.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News