SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (4616)2/3/2001 8:50:31 PM
From: E  Read Replies (3) of 82486
 
I know you've never used the word soul.

It is the word usually used for the entity that makes a fertilized egg, in the minds of those like you, sacred.

Maybe you don't use the word sacred? You choose the vocab.

Let's say that the fertilized egg has an X in it. That X makes it advisable to force a woman to gestate it until it becomes a child.

Or... that X actually MAKES the microscopic entity a "child" in some way having to do with the defining and sufficient quality of human beings being that X.

This is a misunderstanding:

You write:

<< I would like to reduce people's suffering but the fact that someone possibly might suffer in the future if you let
them live does not justify killing them.>>

I was referring to the suffering of the women forced against their will to gestate and bear and, usually, care for -- or watch starve -- children, by those not walking in those women's shoes.

EDIT: I haven't gone back to see... but wait -- if you mean famine, and disease, from overpopulation -- if you mean that you don't think the fact that they will die in agony after living in agony, is sufficient reason to provide birth control and abortion if a woman begs for it...

I can't even talk about this right now I'm so horrified at the idea that that's what you meant.

Is it?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext