Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 163.73

-0.5%

11:51 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mightylakers who wrote (6939)	2/4/2001 10:56:33 AM
From: jackmore	Read Replies (2) of 197218

<<NO WHERE ON A NOKIA PRODUCT WOULD THERE BE A "LICENSED BY QUALCOM" STICKER. NOKIA DEVELOPS ITS OWN CDMA CHIPSET. ANY ROYALTY PAID TO QUAILCOM WOULD BE ON THE VERY BASIC IPR LEVEL AND WOULD NOT REQUIRE A MENTION ON THE PRODUCT. WHAT YOU MIGHT SEE ON OTHER MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT IS A CO-BRANDING AGREEMENT, BUT WE DO NOT DO THAT. THE AGREEMENT NOKIA MADE WITH TELSON IS FOR THE KOREAN MARKET.>> Blatantly false. Lots of doubletalk. I have in my posession a Nokia 5185i that I bought at a local Verizon store that has a "Made in Korea" label on it. Also says Licensed by Qualcomm and lists some patent numbers. Nok IR is being evasive. Their own press release on the Telson deal indicated that phones could be sold in markets other than Korea, as I recall. The real question: Why all the doubletalk in response to a straight forward question? Is it because they really are using Qs chips in some fraction of phones, and don't want that to be known? /jack

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next