SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 142.62+2.2%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bo Le who wrote (9476)2/6/2001 5:35:46 PM
From: The Ox  Read Replies (1) of 10921
 
But this time he is wrong. Once the recession become obvious, the Nazdog could easily fall below 2000.

The recession could not only come in next few month, it could be a big and lasting one.


Just like you were wrong?

Nov 2 '00 you predicted: Now it is clear that the Nazdaq will move higher, much higher, because fund managers have no choices but chase issues like YHOO, CMGI, HLIT, and many others. The Nasdaq was over 3000 at that time and has yet to "move higher, much higher". From: Message 14712728

I realize in hindsight it's easy for me to 'pick on you' but I thought this should be pointed out.

I believe the recovery will be swifter than many expect because I think the downturn was directly related to events that occurred in CY99 and the first half of CY00. The increased spending by almost every firm, from traditional/old to 'new' economy companies, to 'combat/prevent' the Y2K crisis caused a spike in demand in the 'high technology' sectors. Many 'high tech' companies looked stronger in late 99-early 00 than they truly were because of this increased demand. We are now in the wake of the temporary spike in spending. I believe this is one of the main reasons why everything looked so rosy back in March 00 and why we've seen such a quick, severe downturn in many sectors of the economy.

IMO,
mh
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext