Rande - OT> Well, I haven't placed Softie on ignore either (for a couple reasons, amusement being the main one), and from the responses, it seems others haven't either - but as anyone who reads here regularly knows, I have been quite critical of Softie's comments over time.
I should point out its not been Softie's message - but his manner that upset me.
That said, Softie's posts this evening about CSCO and a few of his other recent comments IMO are far more accurate and of value than Spirits.
And remember - this is coming from someone who has bashed Softie a lot.
my point of raising this is the following - you say at Insighters - ", each message board [on whatever trading style] has its own reigning manager with powers to move, edit or delete a post"
While that sounds great in concept, I hope you have given serious thought about just who those "managers" are. IMO, unless they are openminded enough to consider and encourage discussion on both sides of the coin, that system will actually prove to be more detrimental than positive. If a manager in charge of a board is too bullish or bearish or just plain has a one sided view, it could limit a lot of viewpoints and input - and wouldn't be worhwhile participating in. So, I would just urge you to have caution on who those folks are - as that could make or break things in some respect.
just my opinion |
