when the cell starts its little dance of division, well life has begun.
By that standard, anyone who takes a blood sample, or surgically removes a tumor, is a mass murderer.
Where do you not see the logic in the term pro-choice? There is a choice that people want the right to make, therefore they call themselves pro choice. I suppose that if they wanted to clear up any possibility of misunderstanding, they should call themselves pro-reproductive choice, but perhaps they simply thought that most people would be intelligent enough to understand. If that was the case, they were obviously wrong.
Tell me, since you obviously want the State to compel pregnant women to have children whether they want them or not, do you also think that the state should compel the fathers of those children to provide a decent living for those children, or, if the fathers can't or won't, that the state should provide the decent living? |
