SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (131877)2/7/2001 4:09:11 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1571204
 
Comments like "$1.6 trillion isn't very much", are an indication of a
major disconnect with reality.


It is a lot of money from almost any normal human perspective. However it is the total amount over time over the whole of a large and rich nation. You could try to estimate its effect out 100 years and get a figure well over 10 times as large but would it be useful? I find the best way to measure tax cuts is by the percentage of GDP or by the percentage federal tax revenues are reduced, or perhaps by the percentage marginal rates are reduced. By all of these measures this tax cut is noticeably smaller then Reagan's and is also smaller then Kennedy's. It is not huge doesn't change our country to any significant extent is is a marginal change. Many people might not even notice the lower tax bill all that much.

Edit -

It is probably best for human beings to not view their lives in terms of geologic time

I was just responding to Ted's statement about the ANWR being detsroyed forever. (Or more specificalyl "for good"). I might have been nit picking but the statement was technically inaccurate.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext