SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go?
EMC 29.050.0%Sep 15 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gus who wrote (12088)2/9/2001 9:41:03 AM
From: pirate_200  Read Replies (1) of 17183
 
> Setting aside the first stone cast, did you even bother to check the balance sheet? Perchance
> you're color-blind, these are well-known accounting red flags worthy of further investigation and
> a vigorous reexamination of your most cherished assumptions about NTAP and its competitive positioning.

Since you later point to a Motley Fool message, apparently this
argument isn't yours either, why not also be fair and bring up the
reply:

boards.fool.com

This was all addressed in the conference call: if you like I'll
point you to the minute and second of the Q&A to listen. I'm
asking you to tell the truth and not misrepresent information
which you are clearly doing.

> I'll address your other points individually and as time permits. I gotta tell you dude, I'm sorely tempted not to even attempt to disabuse you of your most
> glaring misconceptions.

Well, when you go back to however you are talking to, ask them
this simple question: why doesn't EMC use RAID when they do their
SPEC SFS benchmarks? The Symmetrix, the Celerra/Symmetrix and the
IP-4700 are all benchmarked with RAID *OFF* - why is that? (NOTE:
RAID-0, which EMC places in the notes section, is simply non-parity
protected "striping" which isn't RAID - so that isn't an answer).

You are taking this personally and all I am asking for is an
honest, balanced argument.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext