<< "An abortion kills a human fetus." That’s what we’re talking about, right? Killing a fetus? ... We have to kill mammals, birds, and fish before we eat them. You got a problem with that?
>>
Excuse me, if I respond to your note. I enjoyed reading it and felt compelled to respond.
Killing a fetus, or killing a deer, or killing a whale. It's all killing, sometimes necessary, sometimes not. When you say that all pro-choicers dislike the word "killing" you are generalizing, which is never correct.
"Killing a fetus"?! It's just words. What counts is the right for a woman to chose when and if she wants a child. Call it killing, if you want. Call it "putting a hit on a fetus", if you'd prefer.
<< If a woman pays for an abortion and the fetus isn’t killed, she hasn’t gotten her money’s worth. She wants that thing dead. >>
She has legal recourse, currently, to sue the doctor, or to get her money back and find a better doctor.
<< When you see a picture of the result of an abortion, you know instantly that some "pro-lifer" has violated the liberal code of decency.
Abortion advocates hate those pictures. >>
You are generalizing again. I welcome pictures of aborted fetuses. Perhaps it would help some women to decide whether they really wanted an abortion, or not.
<< ... their own self-imposed gag rule that forbids frank public discussion of fetal killing. >>
Let's have a frank discussion on fetal killing. I am pro abortion, pro choice and pro life. You start this frank discussion and I'll join in. Don't thank me now. Wait until we get this discussion started! |
