SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (24338)6/4/1997 11:23:00 PM
From: Sabrejet   of 58324
 
Fred, I agree with your reference to shareholder value add and my point was not directed at the differences between MSFT and INTC but the similarities of IOM and INTC. I disagree with you on the fact that INTC is not a cyclical stock. Would you say that CYRX is a growth stock? I know INTC has performed like a growth stock but technically it's not. We can argue until we are blue in the face but that is a difference of opinion. INTC has a niche product with a monopoly, similiar to IOM's. There is nothing wrong with that but their market share is abnormal.

I never stated a word in regards to DRAM! Please don't insult me like that! One only has to look down the street to see the difference in a commodity and what INTC produces; enough said.

Finally, you need not patronize me or imply <This is simply incorrect but don't feel bad......it has taken WS many years to undertand this and many analysts still don't get it even today.> I get the impression everyone has to prove to others all the time about how educated they are in this investing thing. Your statements and conjectures to follow were somewhat misleading and logically incorrect. I can handle a civil discussion! Let's please understand that!

Rich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext