SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (139)2/13/2001 2:21:46 PM
From: chris431  Read Replies (1) of 52237
 
Did Kumar call it a short? Did Kumar even call it an outright "sell?" I'm a critic of both INTC & analysts (INTC will be a sub $30 stock). Kumar was wrong....he told his fishees that INTC was a good trading buy & it plummeted the next day or so.

I agree. Do your own work. But I'd never give an analyst credit for calling the top. Many on the AMD threads were talking of INTC woes for more than 6 months before Kumar. And, yes, he didn't use it to the best of his advantage. Of course, he couldn't....he's a highly paid tout.

I think we share similar opinions on the matter. Just a different way of addressing it....Kumar isn't all that the single call made him out to be. Check out his INTC tout reports the last year & you'll see how great of an analyst he is (AMD is suppose to be out of business & INTC is suppose to be hitting record levels of market share, yadda yadda typical cheerleading blabber that comes out of analysts). I'm sure the rest of the stocks he touts have also proven his analysis wrong. Kumar is no better than the rest of his touting buddies who make there living lying to the public. It's just the past few months he finally pulled his head out of his former employee's @$$ (INTC). Or, perhaps, his firms holdings in INTC changed (IIRC, Kumar had switched firms sometime before that call....coincidence?).

In conclusion, Dennis, your analysis & commentary is of far greater value than Kumar's. That's the bottom line (hehehehe).

Chris
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News