I do NOT concede that- I very carefully pointed out the distinction between your publicly calling a person disturbed, an indictment on a person's entire mental health, and my calling the act of doing so nasty. The ACT was nasty, not the person who committed it. It is a distinction that you, as a parent, should be well aware of.
(I love you, but not what you did to the wallpaper)
I have already said that I do not know exactly what X meant and that she could, if she cared, reply to that. But I know X well, and she is extremely sane, emotionally much healthier than a lot of people around here, and very empathetic.
But as I reread your question, yes- I THINK (subject to change) that I might disagree that someone is morally admirable, but yes- they could be emotionally and mentally healthy. |
