SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTEL TRADER

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jurgen Trautmann who wrote (8976)2/14/2001 1:06:01 PM
From: MonsieurGonzo  Read Replies (2) of 11051
 
JT> short call strategies

in mid-DEC I started playing with a more-or-less classic "textbook" index underlying (MDY or QQQ) holding where you "leg into" selling CALLs at apparent tops.

the essential idea was to maintain a $100K position of the underlying, for example, I buy 1800s QQQ at 55.56 (or under) and call it, record this as "1800s QQQ @ 55.56 PAR thus".

As the NDX rises, I'll sell 100s lots of QQQ at PAR points, for example: sell 100s @ 58.8 = 1700s QQQ at 58.8 PAR thus = $100k; and, sell 100s @ 62.5 = 1600s QQQ at 62.5 PAR thus; etc. This maintains a $100K underlying position.

Then, at some apparent TOP, say ~68 (the last time I did this) I have: 1500s at QQQ 66.67 PAR thus; I have 3 x 100s sales of QQQ @ 58.8, 62.5 and 66.67 = ~$18K CASH:MM% profit; and I sold 15 near-month, FEB63C @ 7.x

...which I bought-to-close at 60~63 for around a buck; ie., a ~10% decline from short-term TOP.

I've had/noticed two problems with this approach.

First, a 10% downside "textbook" hedge of NDX is not deep enough, and there is very little, if any time-value premium available by going any deeper (say, selling QQQ FEB58C when the price of QQQ underlying is ~68). The implication being that I would have been better off selling the entire 1500s position @ ~68 apparent TOP and buying a long PUT.

Second, as the textbook does point out, covered CALL writing ~ even if it is "clever" or, well-timed at apparent TOPs ~ will only succeed if the underlying is fundamentally growing; ie., does not make "lower lows", thus producing more decay in the underlying than can be recovered by ANY short CALL strategy.

nonetheless, I've got about +15% gain over the last two options expiry cycles (JAN & FEB), it's easy to see the gains because they are the $15K CASH:MM% balance; but I'm disappointed because at one point the account was, "$100K of QQQ + $30K CASH:MM%"...

so, I conclude that ~ in light of "no growth" ~ we are probably better off using at the money options to ride WAVES up and down; ie., LEAPS require an UpTrend or, at the very least stationarity + clever timing ~ and so do "textbook covered call strategies".

-Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext