> You are one weird dude. Persistent, but weird. First you
> barge into here, accusing me of repeating EMC Marketing and
> then you keep on trying to change the topic every time I use
> facts to expose your shallow arguments.
I think if you are honest and look at all the notes I have
entered, I keep asking the same two questions, which you are
yet again avoiding:
1. Why does EMC benchmark with RAID *OFF*?
2. Why didn't EMC use their IP-4700 benchmarks to highlight
it's superiority?
You've cut and pasted all kinds of nice freely available
material on RAID, which I already know about, you are
avoiding answering the simple question.
NTAP, Sun Microsystems, Hewlett Packard, IBM and even Auspex
(using EMC's Crosstor file system) benchmark with RAID "ON".
EMC doesn't because if they did, you would see how bad their
performance is - see Auspex's performance with Crosstor for
a comparison.
This is important, because all customers that buy data
storage arrays, NAS or SANs, want parity-protection. Either
mirroring or some form of other RAID'd parity protection.
"First you barge into here" - how does one "barge in" on
Silicon Investor? Have I missed missing, is there a posting
protocol page or door bell I must ring?
Calling me names and avoiding answering questions, isn't
going to make them, or me, go away Gus. |
