Harry,
Nonetheless, its gross how your party colleagues have hounded this man because he is flawed. Don't those a-holes have anything better to do? They are wasting my tax $$$ with their partisan bullshit.
I can't believe you and the others on this thread are proud to belong to an organization that behaves in this fashion. What's next? Laughing at people with drinking problems? Oh, no, can't do that.....then you guys would have to laugh at the current president.
The above is what I originally posted. When I said "What's next?", I meant "What's next [for the Reps. to ridicule].
<<<<<What's next? Laughing at people with drinking problems? Oh, no, can't do that.....then you guys would have to laugh at the current president.<<<<<
That statement is really brilliant. In the previous paragraph you claimed that the rep. have hounded this man because he is flawed. And yet here you are, hounding GW because he isn't perfect enough for you. Did GW have a drinking problem in the past? Yes. Did the public know about it during the election. Yes. Has GW stopped drinking. Yes, over 15 yrs ago. Is GW doing drugs now. No; Gw took a drug test several wks ago and made drug testing mandatory for employment at the White House. Did the public know GW may have done drugs in the past. Yes. Jay Leno mentioned it almost every night. Yet here we are, GW carried 30 states and the election; in spite of his past flaws. GW has proved with his drug tests and his actions that his past flaws are just that; in the past. Can you say the same of slick Willy?
I was not laughing at Bush because he was an alcoholic. What I was saying is that the Reps. can't laugh at people with drinking problems because their candidate is an alcoholic. My point? No one can afford to throw stones because no one is without flaws.......even me. ;~))
Nonetheless, its gross how your party colleagues have hounded this man because he is flawed. Don't those a-holes have anything better to do? They are wasting my tax $$$ with their partisan bullshit. <<<<<<
I assumed that the "its gross how your party have hounded this man" refers to the republican party and that man refers to slick Willy; and by saying "its gross" I assumed you disagreed the congressional investigations into slick Willy's flaws. If all of those assumptions are correct, why is it that you feel hounding or investigating GW's past flaws are perfectly fine, but looking into Bill's current flaws are gross?
No one is hounding Bush for is drinking problems because the people who could/ would [read dems] don't because they don't think its appropriate/proper. However the Reps apparently think its okay to go after someone with sexual improprieties/hangups. My high school fraternity brothers were like that; my college frat. brothers less so.
My conclusion still stands.....grow up Reps. Its getting very old and makes the US look like the bush leagues...oops, sorry; like a bantam weight class.
ted |
