SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 207.67+2.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (28682)2/15/2001 5:31:57 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Scumbria, <Use five cores, save 50% die area, and have a supercomputer for $50.>

Sure, and use two cores, save 80% die area, yada yada. There are still tons of applications out there which are single-threaded and won't benefit from multiple cores, or SMT, or any sort of thread-level parallelism in general. IBM's Power4 makes sense because server applications can benefit tremendously from thread-level parallelism. But that's still improving the performance only for specific purposes.

The good thing about continuing the pursuit for single-threaded performance is that it can benefit all applications, including those which are multi-threaded. What good is having two cores for a given die size when you can have one core that does 2x the performance per core?

Tenchusatsu

P.S. - We already have a "supercomputer on a chip." It's called the G4. (Speaking of which, I've got a "mainframe in a console" called the Nintendo 64.) ;-)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext