SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 259.65+2.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (28710)2/15/2001 10:13:10 PM
From: Charles RRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Scumbria,

<Integrated DRAM controllers are a bad idea because it gates the ultimate cost- time to market.>

Why? I would come to the exactly opposite conclusion. i.e., integrated DRAM controller *IMPROVES* time to market. No need to keep getting stuck with the same old motherboard signal integrity problems.

<DRAM changes all the time, ..>

As I said there was just one fundamental change in DRAMs in the last decade so may be you can explain where you are coming from.

<...and having an integrated DRAM controller forces CPUs into obsolesence quickly. >

What is the basis for the "obsolesence"? In the last 3 years AMD had K6, K6-2, K6-3, K7, K7.5, Thunderbird, Duron and is about to get to Palomino. It looks to me processors get obseleted faster than memory types. How do you see this differently?

<The time to design and qualify a new spin is extremely expensive, and makes integrated memory controllers a real, real bad idea in the desktop market.>

See above.

Chuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext