SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3014)2/16/2001 12:54:05 AM
From: Don Lloyd  Read Replies (1) of 3536
 
Ron -

...I think the concept of taking a percentage of FICA tax payments (2-3%) and providing the payer the option of having them placed in an IRA is incredibly important to weaning this society off of depending on SS as a retirement program....

Have you thought this through? Does it really make any logical sense for a partial privatization?

If you divert 2% of your payroll taxes to an IRA, presumably your benefits will be appropriately reduced. How does this benefit the overall solvency of the SS system? The system loses the current payments in exchange for the reduction in future liabilities.

The only way the system can benefit is by stealing your presumably higher returns at the other end. If it does so, why would you choose to participate? You get to risk lower returns without a possible reward because you don't get to keep the possibly higher returns.

A total privatization doesn't suffer from this problem.

What am I missing?

Regards, Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext