SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hmaly who wrote (132892)2/16/2001 3:59:40 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1570498
 
Harry,

GW doesn't currently have any drinking problems because he hasn't had a alcoholic drink in 15 yrs. GW has alcoholism, the underlying reason why many people have drinking problems.

Bush is an alcoholic....he has a problem with drinking. This will be true until the day he dies. Fifteen years of sobriety is good but doesn't guarantee anything. That's why 12 step programs take it one day at a time.

GW has been able to control his flaws. Bill should have been able to control his also.

Who died and made you king?

Clinton and Bush are two different people with 2 different problems and 2 different levels of support. When they deal with their problems is their business. Obviously drinking can have a much greater impact on the day to day aspects of your life....so maybe that's why Bush has dealt with his problems earlier.

<<<<No one can afford to throw stones because no one is without flaws.......even me. ;~)) <<<<<<

Hogwash. If GW currently had drinking problems, I wouldn't defend it; the same with drugs.

There is a big difference between being put in the position of defending someone and throwing stones at them. I will never defend Clinton's dealings with Lewinsky. But frankly, I can handle that better than the snickering of his opponents over the issue. What is that saying from the Bible: " Let he without sin cast the first stone".

No one is hounding Bush for is drinking problems because the people who could/ would [read dems] don't because they don't think its appropriate/proper. <<<<

Scumbria is.

Is he, or is he doing a tit for tat?

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News