George,
Did you catch last year when Zeev and the other men of their
company got their picture taken with the magazine article
that presented their story as a group of inventors different
from most in that they actually create useful products that
we the public benefit from when they are placed into the workings
of the economy so that investment money creates goods and services
in that positive way of making money "work" and generate wealth.
Don't want you to get the wrong impression about Zeev,
in that i'm not sure, but he was not identified in that
article as that person in the company of these 5 men who
functioned as the one most responsible to keep the other 4
in-line and prevent the research and discovery phase to go
beyond the point that scientist are all too willing to go
just for the science, and to hell with commercial applications.
It may be a flaw in Zeev's character that the other 4 men allow,
as Zeev in the picture was the only one wearing a tie. :+)
You mentione the following about Zeev.
None of my SI BookMarks has Zeev as a regular,
and I never did PeopleMark anyone, so what Zeev has done
lately is probably the same that lead him to be one of the
most PeopleMarked persons on Si, which means he is as you
say "very good on the stock market." But to give Zeev the
"has correctly been a gold perma-bear for years" can not
really be anything more than his "The trend is your friend."
In all market matters knowledge, when Zeev sneezes very hard
or drink a can of beer or glass of wine, the number of his
brain cells wiped out from those events contain more market
knowledge stuff that i have completely store in all my brain cells.
ok, but physical gold as a commodity within a market,
even as it functioned as such for a zillion yesterdays
and today and for most likely tomorrow up to a zillion
more tomorrows, yes Zeev is correct to call it that
while at the same time Zeev is missing 99.99% the picture
of physical gold as it functions within the framwork of
Mankind these zillion yesterdays and today.
Someday is possible that i will ask ChucaMarshMello
if Zeev without his tie on will tie one on and lose
his scientific principles and let his no hair down
and let it all hang out and realize that he is that
gold bug person after all.
When Zeev says, "... do not understand what is the safety
with the yellow one." is very telling because of the word
he used, "with" rather than "in", as "with" points to an "in",
while an "in" keeps the non identified "it" seperate.
And Zeev thinks he is English challenged. @:O)
(from the Zeev post)
... are still 20,000 tonnes waiting to be dumped on the market
every time the price of gold approaches $300
... simply is a commodity of which we have a huge inventory
(about ten years of production). Zeev
Maybe hutch_no_doing will do that walk of his talk.
But then probably not as hutch_talk_no_walk will continue
to take and exercise his fifth admendmint so that he will
incrimindate himself.
To:Hutch
From: George S. Cole
Saturday, Feb 3, 2001
Hutch, Time to put up! You say GATA does not understand
the factors that influence gold prices. What are those
factors in your judgement? Does not Greenspan's statement
about CBs offering more gold for lease if the price should rise
amount to an implicit committment to bail out the shorts if they
ever get into trouble? |
