Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.56

+10.2%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (127684)	2/17/2001 11:01:33 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Now started threatening people with future harassment ? I think you're doing a great job already. I know this is a sore point for you. Elmer and you too know that P4 has no "modern" code to show all that great MHz advantage and you are deluding yourselves by hoping that Intel will pull another PPro. PPro ran "fading" 16 bit code slow and the industry was in transition to full 32 bit already. Even then Intel had to fix the problem in PII. But now the situation is different. There is competition which is faster than the fastest P4 and Microsoft is not releasing an OS specific to P4. I know, I know with 1.75v P4 will run at 1.7 GHz. The fact voltage had to be upped is a great indication of how "infinitely scaleable" P4 is. Muzo

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next