Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (1104)	2/21/2001 4:59:04 PM
From: dantecristo	Read Replies (1) of 12465

Cobalt: one of the biggest problems with the anit-SLAPP statutes is recognizing a lawsuit as one. In the Varian v. Delfino SLAPP the first complaint listed criminal claims (since dropped), a Federal Lanham Act violation (since dismissed) and several other claims that made it difficult to see the Varian SLAPP for what it was: geocities.com It would be great if the Plaintiffs would say, hello, guess what? I'm filing a SLAPP against you so now you know to go get the proper protection. That is why the www.johndoes.org and this thread are so useful and why I "post like a bunny" about the Varian SLAPP so that hopefully there is a ground-swelling of knowledge that develops out there. Also, I think SLAPPers can find so many ways to avoid getting caught under the anti-SLAPP statutes. I believe the best solution is that places like Yahoo!, Raging Bull, etc. not store IP and email addresses and other traceable information that can then later be subpoenaed, legitimately or otherwise. -Mary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next