Carl,
Since you're apparently not going to rewrite that post in English, I'll take a stab at the p.s. at least. Tomorrow you can try to clear up the first part.
At least when I made up a rumor I did it after hours and corrected it before the market opened the next morning.
LOL! So let me get this straight. It's okay to make up a bulls**t lie as long as it's cleared up before the market opens. Does that extend to the rest of your life? It's okay to tell the boss a lie as long as you clear it up before business starts the next day? Is it okay to tell your wife a lie as long as you get it cleared up before you have sex with her again? What, exactly, is the statute of limitations for "clearing up a lie"? Before someone else finds out? In spite of the fact that someone might have believed it in the meantime and sweated things a bit? Do you need to "correct" it before the pre-market session or just before the regular session to make it no longer a lie?
What a screwed up sense of ethics you seem to have.
Scumbria: just so I don't have to ever argue about this with you again, take note that Carl has admitted again to his lying to the thread. And I'll say this one more time for you as well -- just because someone lies or commits a crime doesn't make it right for someone else to do it. Whether Reagan or Bush or whoever did anything wrong doesn't excuse Clinton. Stop using that lame defense. IMO, they all should have probably been impeached or jailed. Just because Joe robs a bank and isn't caught doesn't mean that Frank shouldn't go to jail when he robs a bank and is caught. Is this sinking in, yet?
Here's a prediction: You're never even going to admit that you were less than truthful.
Well, that didn't take long for you to be wrong. If you'll check the top part of your own post, you'll find that you copied my phrase "In spite of the fact that I said "I'll" hold them, the reality is that I can't touch them. " What is that except an admission that I was not correct in my original post? So I admitted it before you even predicted that I wouldn't. You, too, apparently could use some help with reading comprehension. (p.s. I also bought and sold INAP in my trading accounts once last year. I may, in fact, have been talking about those shares, but I don't have my records with me in Florida and can't be certain. I'll let you know when I get back home.)
You're a sanctimonious @sshole.
I can be. Usually when I meet regular a**holes. Liars, hypocrites, etc. annoy the s**t out of me.
And that's not all. I also predict that you don't have any problems with dishing it out, but you can't take it.
Take what? So far you've posted one laughably misleading and incorrect post about "liars", which I corrected for you, and one rambling post I haven't been able to figure out. Oh, yeah, and one idiotic post on the INAP thread, for which I've apologized to them for you. And, of course, that strange message about AMZN where you later admitted that I didn't say what you thought I was saying.
I can certainly handle that. ln fact, you're serving up softballs. C'mon, fire up that search engine! But read the stuff you're posting first to make sure that it at least makes sense. |
