SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : VOISEY BAY'S FIND - A NEW DISCOVERY
CME 285.07+0.5%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Supervalue who wrote (14)6/5/1997 6:25:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs   of 481
 
Sheesh, William.

Post #5 is all about Gallery's website which has Okak Bay geophysical
magnetic anomalies, chloritic alteration, the Abloviak shear zone, etc.

I was questioning the lack of troctolite at Okak Bay--really there is a big
difference between what I asked you and what Gallery has posted.

FYI--Voisey's Bay orebodies & mineralization do not exhibit the type of
magnetic signature which Gallery is posting on their website. There is
no chloritic alteration associated with any VB orebody which I'm aware
of. And while the Abloviak Shear Zone trends NNW--all of the VB
orebodies trend EW along post-Abloviak normal faulting. Gallery's Okak
Bay webpage is largely "techno-babble"--but I was happy to read that they
propose doing deep-looking geophysics prior to drilling. Absolut's
recent "blind-drilling" of a barren 1.5-km hole east of Eastern Deeps
should not mimicked, IMHO.

BTW--Tech's (formerly Donner) property south of Voisey does have
troctolite. Grades and volumes have been pretty skimpy to date--but
Tech-types are still calling it a VB look-alike. We'll all see
this summer if Norm Keevil has something to show for his efforts.

Good Luck but Okak Bay still looks like Carabou Pasture to me, T.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext