SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 301.11+6.9%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mitch-c who wrote (42702)2/26/2001 3:04:03 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (3) of 70976
 
My stance today:

I see:
1. a U-shaped downturn. That is, I don't foresee the 1998-type V-shaped downturn (straight down and straight up). The 1998 downturn was fixed quickly by governments/IMF/world bank. It was due to an abrupt shutoff of capital, a liquidity panic. Today's downturn is due to a sharp falloff in end-user demand, which is working its way up the supply chain. There is no quick fix for this. And I also don't see a L-shape (Japan since 1989, U.S. in 1930s). There is a fundamental strength in in the U.S. economy today (in spite of debt levels and trade deficit) that makes a decade-long downturn very unlikely. If that scenario becomes widely believed, I'll take that as a sign of a bottom.
2. Next earnings season will be as bad as this one: missing/warning/no visibility. After that, the Fed cuts will start to take effect.
3. For the next 3 months, the techs will continue to be in a bear market. Rising chip inventories, falling profits, will put a lot of pressure on semis to continue cutting capex. I think there is a 50:50 chance Intel may reduce (or delay) their capex. Yes, I know they recently reiterated that number. The day they cut capex forecasts may be capitulation in the semi-equips.
4. I think the recent strength in semi-equips , compared to other techs, is because we haven't yet reached capitulation, not because investors are "looking accross the valley".

Mistakes I've made in the past, that I am going to try not to repeat:
1. thinking I know where the bottom will be: in 1996, I guessed too high, and was fully invested long before the low. In 1998, I guessed too low, and only got 200 LEAPs (I had intended buying much more). So, I need a plan that only depends on knowing very approximately where the bottom is. I think there is a high probability of retesting the previous lows (34); beyond that, I have no idea.
2. selling too early. I sold half my LEAPs in January 1999, for a quick triple. I would have done much better to hold them all to Jan. 2000. This time, I hold everything at least till I have long-term cap gains. I'm thiking around 100 as a target price.

My plan, for now:
1. short at 49
2. stop-loss at 55
3. cover at 41
4. begin to buy 2003 50s (calls), when the stock hits 35. If we bounce there, forming a double bottom, double up.
5. Buy in 5-point increments on any further 5-point decline in the stock.
6. Load up, if there are 2 consecutive increases in bookings, because the trough is past.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext