SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (712)2/26/2001 8:09:58 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) of 948
 
Such a law would have the following general themes
which I have actually mentioned in an earlier post
in reply to someone else.

The person could be forced to donate blood only if all
of the following conditions are met:

1) The person is directly and intentionally responsible for
causing the victim's life-threatening condition.

2) The victim has no other recourse and will otherwise die.

3) The forced donation would not kill or permanently injure
the donor.

Of course, this is for the benefit of others who may be reading.
You do not acknowledge any difference between "victim" and
"attacker", so you can not intelligently comment on this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News