SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: robnhood who wrote (72289)2/27/2001 11:22:06 AM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
They did, but most of the real damage came long after the crash day. I would liken the '29 crash day to our bad week in April 2000 when Naz dumped over 20%. They arrived with similar timing and relative severity on a weekly chart basis. Our "crash" that launched the bear was rather stealthy, and spread out over a week.

It could be different this time, with a crash off much lower levels, but I don't see much argument for that in Naz. DJIA could still go that way when 10K finally yields, but I think Naz has given too much already.

The entire Japanese event unfolded without a "crash", which leads me to believe that it may be possible for us to bleed without that single-day implosion.

BC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News