<<<Of course this totally upsets another myth, that of male domination and power. Sorry about upsetting another apple cart on you!>>>
Why was that posted to me? To imply that I have been railing, cartoon-like, against "male domination and power"? Please produce evidence. C'mon! Do it! Evidence! A link! You wouldn't be lying, would you? If you're not lying by insinuation again, you'll be able to produce evidence, right?!
Speaking of evidence, prevaricator joe-- come on, don't just evade and obfuscate and change the subject to new baseless insinuations; let's stick with the one below a little longer:
To:average joe who
wrote (6407)
From: E
Saturday, Feb 24, 2001 5:55 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to 6434 of 6735
<<<It certainly does not need to be "sentient" or "truly alive" by E's
classification to be human. I guess "truly alive" to you
would be E burning her bra at a street party. But is that really sentient? >>>
You have quoted a phrase, "truly alive," as "E's classification." I challenge
you to produce any post of mine with that phrase or classification in it. I
have never used such a phrase or evoked such a classification in connection
with the abortion discussion, since it is obvious that all cells that aren't
dead, including plant cells and mouse cells and those constituting tumors, are
"truly alive."
This is a specific direct accusation that you have misquoted me, and an
objection to your doing so.
I believe you to be habitually dishonest. This is a chance to prove that in
this case, at least, your "quote" was not a fiction.
Show me where you got your quote or admit it wasn't a quote of me at all,
only a phrase it suited you to present as one.
Message 15406378 |
