No need to get accusatory Gus, because I agree with you.
Although sharing CERTAIN common values, the US and Europe diverge when it comes to accomodating a multi-ethnic and diverse society. In Europe, nationalism masks itself as racism, and maybe both are inherently intertwined, or even, to an extent, interchangable.
But the US, while certainly a cultural work in progress, is built upon a foundation of immigration from all parts of the world. In essence, the US is a reflection of the world, and a reflection of the struggles, and the possibilities, of diverse people living together under one constitutional framework. Obviously, it's not yet perfect, but when faced with increasing societal stress, we seem to find common ground and tolerance.
Now we have to ask ourselves why the US has been relatively successful in achieving this "melting pot" society. First of all, I believe it's due to adherence to a common shared (or accepted) view of inalienable human rights. Secondly, I believe it's the view that everyone has a right to seek the opportunity for personal wealth. Call it worshipping the almighty dollar, or what have you, but it's important that people feel they have access to the opportunities that their intelligence and abilities enable them to take advantage of.
I see neither of these conditions prevalent in Europe, and thus, it may be difficult for them to easily accomplish these necessary structural changes in their societal demographics.
But Gus, I certainly am not the person who would be defending Europe's potential to be a "United States of Europe". In fact, I'm one of those who believe that Europe will face serious problems trying to run its economy as a confederacy. It will constantly face challenges and rivalies between economic entities that will undermine the value of its currency.
Btw, I'm all for McDonalds, AND the death penalty.
Regards,
Ron |