SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Computer Learning

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (17001)2/28/2001 10:35:22 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (2) of 110626
 
No answers, just more questions...

I believe that two drives are better than one that is partitioned. Redundancy has its benefits.

I'm not a hardware person: I'm more comfortable with an axe than a soldering iron. Please bear with my ignorance for a moment.

As I understand it, two disks on one controller will only operate one at a time. Two disks on two controllers will both operate at the same time. So, with one controller, if one was to copy a huge file, such as an image, one disk would read, then stop while the other disk would write. When the writing finishes on the destination disk, the reading resumes on the source disk. With two controllers, both disks will be working, halving the data transfer time.

Sounds like a second controller card comes with considerable performance increases at a relatively low cost. Maybe worth looking into.

Cheers, PW.

P.S. Maybe I'm wrong here, and it's two cables instead of two controllers.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext