SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (837)3/1/2001 4:13:01 AM
From: YlangYlangBreeze  Read Replies (3) of 948
 
I perceive the following list as a continuum of acceptability ranging from those who find non-procreative sex sinful and or immoral, to those who accept abortion at all stages as a woman's rightful choice. Would you agree with the order of the continuum? Are there items you would add, separate, or change the order?

Sex w/o procreative intent/ Masturbation
"natural" birth control (rythym)
pill, condoms, diaphragm, implants, vasectomy, tubal ligation
IUD
Morning after pills
(OTC Morning After?)
RU486
first trimester abortion
later term abortion

People seem to have cut off lines of acceptable, and unacceptable levels of birth control, or abortion.
Example: PBA is never acceptable.
Just before drawing the line, there are often grey areas wherein and individual grapples with conditional acceptability.
Example: Early 2d trimester abortion is perhaps justifiable if due to birth defects discovered at that time.

So probably this should be a chart, wherein qualifying conditions would run across the top of the page, but for now I'm trying to see how where people draw lines, and later will try to understand their rationale for doing so.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext